Now, to let the EAS model "explain" the braking action of bremsstrahlung.

Suppose, for simplicity, we have a proton whose job it is to slow down rapidly passing electrons. We should keep in the back of our minds that there are all kinds of EAS particles involved but let's concentrate only on the particular set of incoming negatrinos (those converging on the proton) which hit the electrons and impel them toward the proton. And we will deal with electrons whose approach speed is near the speed of light.

As the electron is inbound, the negatrino collisions (by negatrinos which are converging on the proton) are from the rear. In this model, the impulses they deliver to the electron are proportional to their closure rates relative to the electron. If the negatrinos are going the speed of light, and the electron is going 99.9 percent the speed of light, in the same direction, the "tail-ender" collisions will have a closure rate of .1 percent the speed of light, and their effect will be minimal. The electron cannot acquire very much speed increase. [This is related to Ritz's hypothesis that instead of mass approaching infinity as objects approach the speed of light, electrodynamic accelerating influences/actions approach zero. See Ritz, (1908) page 194.[1]

As the electron passes by the proton, the inbound negatrinos hit it from the side at full force and can cause its path to change direction, but with little change in speed.

Here comes the fun part!

As the electron heads outbound it will be running head-on into the inbound negatrinos. The collisions will have a closure rate of almost two times the speed of light and this will produce a dramatic braking action. This is handwaving but the computer model [4] lends it credence.

Since all these collisions are on a so-called chaotic basis, it is conceivable that every now and then an electron could shoot past the proton and suffer very few collisions and hence curve very little and brake very little.

If an extra bunch of negatrinos happen to hit the electron from the side, while it is passing the proton, and relatively few [inbound] negatrinos hit it while outbound, we could get bending of the path with minimal braking.

This presentation is based on a talk given at the International Conference on Isaac Newton, in St. Petersburg, Russia, hosted by the Russian Academy of Sciences, 22-27 March 1993. A modified version was presented at the Southwest and Rocky Mountain Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science Annual Meeting at Texas A&M University, May 18-22 1997.

Although not mentioned earlier, the EAS model is a Theory Of Everything. The author just doesn't have electrons and protons figured out yet. [Added 28 May 2005.]

See The EAS Nuclear Glue , EAS Neutron Beta Decay, and EAS Mass Excess for added discussions based on ideas presented in this article.

The author's first open-forum use of the words positrino and negatrino was in this paper, in March 1993. (They were used in the ELECTRON.BAS computer program[4], which was copyrighted in September of 1992.)

Having said that, it turns out the words positrino and negatrino were coined, quantitatively defined, and used extensively by Professor Rati Ram Sharma, in his 1990 book Unified Physical Theory.[5] The author concedes that, (if there are no other contenders) Professor Sharma has priority on the formal and public use of these words.

According to Tony Hollick, R.A. Waldron used the words positrino and electrino in an article titled 'The Spinning Photon' in a Speculations in Science and Technology in 1981. [Added 09 Dec 2005.] Actually, in this particular paper Waldron says that "the mass m [of photons] is constituted of equal parts of positively charged and negatively charged matter, in the form of a vast number of extremely minute particles, called x-particles." He refers readers to a fuller development in his book, R.A. Waldron, The Wave and Ballistic Theories of Light - a Critical Review, Frederick Muller (1977). [Added 30 Dec 2005.]

In his 1977 book, Waldron did not use the words positrino and electrino. He used the generic name of x-particles. [Added 13 Jan 2006.]

References:

[1] Ritz, W., Recherches Critiques sur l'Electrodynamique Generale, Annales de Chimie et de Physique, 13, (1908) 145-275.
    A translation is online. Please see: Critical Researches on General Electrodynamics.
    [Added 23 January 2004. Modified 30 April 2005]

[2] Fox, J.G., Evidence Against Emission Theories, Am. J. of Phys, 33, 1, (1965) NADS (Abstract only).

[2a] Tolman, R., The Second Postulate of Relativity, Phys. Rev., 31 26 (1910) NADS;
    Some Emission Theories of Light, ibid., 35, 136 (1912) NADS.

[3] Ritz, W., Die Gravitation, Scientia, 5, 241-255, (1909); La Gravitation, Scienta, 5 152-165, (1909); see Oeurves Walther Ritz, 462-477, 478-492, Gauthier Villars, Paris (1911).

[4] A QuickBASIC computer program, ELECTRON.BAS models the braking action of bremsstrahlung, as discussed above. Other simulation programs by the author are available on this site at Low-Tec Shareware.

[5] Sharma, R.R., Unified Physical Theory, A Falcon Book from Cosmo Publications, 1990, New Delhi, India.

Notes on reference [2a].

Both Tolman and de Sitter, who were fervently trying to bury Ritz's ballistic emission theory of electrodynamics, espoused the belief that the speed of light was not much affected by its passage through the Earth's atmosphere. Tolman did wrestle with an absorption-emission change in light velocity, but he was primarily concerned with the abrupt reversal in light direction upon its reflection (a change in velocity) by the atoms (charges?) in a mirror's silvered surface.

Recommended Reading:

Extinction Shift Principle - Emission and Re-emission done correctly. - E.H. Dowdye, Jr. - [Added 09 August 2003.]

* * *

Development of Gauss-Weber Electrodynamics..Without Waves V.M. Bernstein.

Basis of SubQuantum Physics - Section 5.1 of Subquantum Paradigm! - Alexander S. Zazerskiy - "Actually I am, just like you, convinced that it is necessary to seek a substructure, while modern quantum mechanics skillfully conceals this necessity, using statistical form." From a letter by Albert Einstein to Lui de Broglie.

Pushing Gravity - New perspectives on Le Sage's theory of gravitation, Matthew R. Edwards (ed.).

    (The EAS model includes a Le Sage type of gravity as a side effect of electricity.
    According to Robert Forward (circa 1972), push gravity theories get invented,
    more or less independently, about every twenty years. Forward is also the person
    who put the author on the trail of Walter Ritz. [Added 26 March 2004.]